PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.10%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.45%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-23.17%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.04%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-51.00%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.22%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-51.00%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 6.48%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-70.84%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.28%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-70.53%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.16%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-70.53%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.28%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.28%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-87.66%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-152.85%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-17.85%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 20.60%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-5.44%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 11.73%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
2.58%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median of 27.10%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
449.55%
OCF/share CAGR of 449.55% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-57.69%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-78.98%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-6.73%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Cyclical median of 10.41%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-53.37%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 6.11%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-62.69%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 56.81%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
94.40%
Equity/share CAGR of 94.40% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
58.86%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
46.18%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 7.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
866.68%
Dividend/share CAGR of 866.68% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
202.74%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 202.74% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
162.32%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 162.32% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-14.09%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-6.68%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-10.10%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-2.73%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.13%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
0.42%
Debt growth of 0.42% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.01%
SG&A growth of 8.01% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.