5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-11.77%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
4.85%
Gross profit growth of 4.85% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
-106.45%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.75%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-106.45%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.38%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-48.94%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.83%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-48.48%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-48.48%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.27%
OCF growth of 62.27% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
78.55%
FCF growth of 78.55% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-10.52%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 18.88%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-6.75%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 10.32%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-11.35%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 17.02%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
282.17%
OCF/share CAGR of 282.17% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
313.21%
OCF/share CAGR of 313.21% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
52.30%
3Y OCF/share growth of 52.30% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-92.17%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Cyclical median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-95.17%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.66%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-95.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 13.83%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
126.55%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 22.04% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
44.92%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 12.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
36.06%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 13.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.97%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-6.14%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
2.88%
Asset growth of 2.88% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
1.87%
BV/share growth of 1.87% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-1.33%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.82%
SG&A growth far above Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.