PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.46%
Positive revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
-41.81%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -2.39%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
14800.00%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 7.57%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
14800.00%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
445.83%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 5.21%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
444.12%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 5.53%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
444.12%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 5.26%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
-0.13%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.13%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-106.36%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-150.08%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-0.63%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 24.65%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-1.75%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 13.57%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-1.70%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 17.49%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
57.19%
OCF/share CAGR of 57.19% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-121.47%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-147.18%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-45.61%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Cyclical median of 25.85%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-78.25%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 20.76%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-79.10%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.27%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
109.02%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 26.59% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
36.19%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 17.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
20.75%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Consumer Cyclical median. Mohnish Pabrai credits disciplined capital allocation for short-term outperformance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.70%
AR growth of 17.70% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
11.16%
Inventory growth far above Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
-2.21%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-7.35%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.29%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
0.78%
Slightly rising debt while Consumer Cyclical median is deleveraging. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm lags behind peers in risk control or invests in more expansions.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-7.04%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.