PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.12%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.22%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
202.67%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.08%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
269.03%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.03%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
269.03%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
418.89%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.36%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
414.96%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.71%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
414.96%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.33%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
1.11%
Share change of 1.11% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
1.11%
Diluted share change of 1.11% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
153.49%
OCF growth of 153.49% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
-74.15%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-3.36%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 23.66%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
1.08%
Below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
-4.19%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 16.14%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-91.08%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-89.59%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-92.29%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
37.31%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 23.67% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
-12.49%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 29.01%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-64.04%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 8.28%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
108.37%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 15.30% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
36.57%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 15.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
7.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR 50-75% of Consumer Cyclical median. Guy Spier suspects suboptimal short-term capital usage vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
3.40%
Inventory growth far above Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
2.00%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.74%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
1.73%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-80.84%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.