PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.80%
Positive revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
25.99%
Positive gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
-1760.00%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.89%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-123.53%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -3.21%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
4.11%
Positive net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.11%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-4.11%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -25.35%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
100.00%
Positive FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch might view this as a notable advantage over peers.
-14.93%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 40.35%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
7.18%
Below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
-16.09%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 12.16%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 6.65%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-122.22%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Cyclical median of 28.18%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-133.33%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 61.19%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-106.42%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.06%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
76.98%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 45.02% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
41.98%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Consumer Cyclical median. Mohnish Pabrai might see disciplined retention of earnings behind outperformance.
6.66%
3Y equity/share CAGR 50-75% of Consumer Cyclical median. Guy Spier suspects suboptimal short-term capital usage vs. peers.
-41.67%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-82.93%
Dividend reductions while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-100.00%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-100.00%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
3.06%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
68.69%
BV/share growth of 68.69% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-100.00%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.