PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.31%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.84%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-15.76%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 7.11%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-30.00%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 6.68%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-471.05%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 10.73%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-210.00%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 14.42%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-200.00%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 13.59%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-200.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 15.17%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
3.33%
Share change of 3.33% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
3.33%
Diluted share change of 3.33% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
63.80%
OCF growth of 63.80% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
34.33%
FCF growth of 34.33% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-11.13%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 43.57%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-7.32%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 22.10%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-30.64%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 12.38%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-118.25%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-113.31%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-466.83%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-140.00%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Cyclical median of 35.20%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-140.00%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 23.43%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-120.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
75.42%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 15.33% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
31.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 16.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
-1.63%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 9.18%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-100.00%
Dividend reductions while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-4.18%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-7.63%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-0.76%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-4.68%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.25%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-71.95%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.