PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.40%
Revenue growth 5-10% – Moderate. Peter Lynch would evaluate product demand drivers to determine if growth can accelerate.
-35.41%
Negative gross profit growth suggests either falling sales or rising direct costs. Benjamin Graham would consider this a fundamental warning sign.
-61.56%
Negative EBIT growth points to weakening core profitability. Benjamin Graham would question management efficiency.
-61.56%
Negative operating income growth means rising costs or falling revenues are eroding core profitability. Benjamin Graham would raise caution.
-168.70%
Negative net income growth shows profitability erosion. Benjamin Graham would worry about solvency and longer-term viability.
-168.65%
Negative EPS growth underscores deteriorating earnings per share. Benjamin Graham would worry about ongoing dilution or weakened profitability.
-168.65%
Negative diluted EPS growth suggests diluted shares grew or net income fell. Benjamin Graham would see this as a serious setback to shareholder value.
0.13%
Share count up to +3% – Slight dilution. Howard Marks would be cautious but might accept it if used for profitable growth investments.
0.13%
Diluted share count up to +3% – Modest dilution. Howard Marks might tolerate it if used for high-ROI projects or strategic acquisitions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.86%
Negative OCF growth is a critical warning sign. Benjamin Graham would check if receivables are ballooning or if core sales are declining.
-18.92%
Negative FCF growth reveals potential liquidity pressures or large capex overshadowing cash generation. Benjamin Graham would demand deeper scrutiny.
0.64%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 0-4% – Very modest. Howard Marks would question whether the company is in a mature industry or losing competitive edge.
9.32%
5Y CAGR 7-10% – Solid. Seth Klarman might check if free cash flow growth parallels top-line expansion.
-8.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR signals recent top-line contraction per share. Benjamin Graham would be skeptical unless a turnaround is clear.
-109.17%
A negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR signals erosion in long-term cash generation. Benjamin Graham would label this as a major red flag.
-128.66%
A negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR indicates declining cash generation per share mid-term. Benjamin Graham would see this as a red flag unless explained by short-term strategic investments.
-106.39%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR shows recent erosion in operating cash. Benjamin Graham would see this as a cautionary signal unless explained by strategic investments.
-152.24%
A negative 10Y net income/share CAGR reflects a decade of weakening profits. Benjamin Graham would be extremely cautious unless a turnaround is evident.
-125.37%
A negative 5Y net income/share CAGR reveals a mid-term deterioration in bottom-line earnings. Benjamin Graham would be cautious unless a credible turnaround is visible.
-111.03%
Negative 3Y net income/share CAGR highlights recent bottom-line decay. Benjamin Graham would want clarity on cost vs. revenue drivers for the declines.
103.75%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 12% – Excellent long-term book value compounding. Warren Buffett would see if consistent profits plus moderate payouts drive this growth.
39.08%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 12% – Strong mid-term book value expansion. Warren Buffett would see if steady profits and moderate payout ratios sustain this pace.
11.68%
3Y equity/share CAGR 8-12% – Very good. Benjamin Graham would confirm intangible valuations or revaluations aren’t artificially inflating equity.
193.55%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 15% – Remarkable long-term payout increases. Warren Buffett would confirm if these distributions are well-covered by free cash flow.
-11.88%
A negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR indicates cuts or stagnation. Benjamin Graham would see it as a warning unless the firm redirected funds to more profitable growth.
-4.37%
A negative 3Y dividend/share CAGR suggests recent cuts. Benjamin Graham confirms if a short-term profit dip or strategic pivot caused them.
14.48%
Receivables growth 10-15% – Some buildup. Peter Lynch checks if it aligns with similar revenue expansion.
1.28%
Inventory growth 0-5% – Generally fine if revenue grows similarly. Seth Klarman confirms no shortage risk that could hamper sales.
-1.36%
Negative asset growth may reflect divestitures or depreciation outpacing new investments. Benjamin Graham wonders if shedding non-core assets improves focus or signals trouble.
-0.26%
Falling book value/share indicates net losses, large dividends, or intangible impairments. Benjamin Graham warns unless there’s a strategic reason.
8.90%
Debt up 5-10% yoy – Noticeable leverage. Howard Marks questions if the returns outstrip higher interest costs.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.92%
SG&A growth 5-10% – Some cost increase. Peter Lynch looks for new marketing or admin expansions that justify this outlay.