PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.36%
Revenue growth 50-75% of HUH1V.HE's 8.37%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
10.71%
Cost growth 1.1-1.25x HUH1V.HE's 8.79%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of cost control initiatives.
-7.00%
Gross profit decline while HUH1V.HE shows 6.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-11.73%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.70%
Other expenses change of 6.70% while HUH1V.HE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
6.70%
Operating expenses growth while HUH1V.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.75%
Total costs growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 6.16%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
7.84%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 1.30%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-1.58%
D&A reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 8.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-19.91%
EBITDA decline while HUH1V.HE shows 24.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.80%
EBITDA margin decline while HUH1V.HE shows 14.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.32%
Operating income decline while HUH1V.HE shows 32.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.27%
Operating margin decline while HUH1V.HE shows 22.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
27.50%
Other expenses growth while HUH1V.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-21.64%
Pre-tax income decline while HUH1V.HE shows 36.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.63%
Pre-tax margin decline while HUH1V.HE shows 25.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.08%
Tax expense reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 36.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-22.45%
Net income decline while HUH1V.HE shows 36.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.40%
Net margin decline while HUH1V.HE shows 25.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.00%
EPS decline while HUH1V.HE shows 35.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.00%
Diluted EPS decline while HUH1V.HE shows 35.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.06%
Share count reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 0.10% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-3.06%
Diluted share reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 0.10% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.