PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.54%
Positive growth while HUH1V.HE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.01%
Cost increase while HUH1V.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-5.90%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.93%
Other expenses reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 2433.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-12.93%
Operating expenses reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 6.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.41%
Total costs growth while HUH1V.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-27.94%
D&A reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 2.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.75%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.41%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.67%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
17.78%
Other expenses growth 1.25-1.5x HUH1V.HE's 12.33%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize cost items.
-7.40%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
12.50%
Tax expense growth while HUH1V.HE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-10.47%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.60%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.60%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.06%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-2.06%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.