PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.14%
Revenue decline while HUH1V.HE shows 2.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.97%
Cost reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 2.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-11.95%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.34%
Other expenses reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 500.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-5.34%
Operating expenses reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 12.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.04%
Total costs reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 3.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 43.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.73%
D&A reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 9.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-16.97%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.15%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.23%
Operating margin growth while HUH1V.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.08%
Other expenses growth while HUH1V.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.41%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.02%
Pre-tax margin growth while HUH1V.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-20.86%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-2.59%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.91%
Net margin growth while HUH1V.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.35%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.35%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.70%
Share count reduction below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.84%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.