PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.77%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x HUH1V.HE's 9.30%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
13.78%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x HUH1V.HE's 10.11%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
7.65%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x HUH1V.HE's 5.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-3.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.28%
Other expenses growth less than half of HUH1V.HE's 44.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
19.28%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 8.01%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.72%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x HUH1V.HE's 9.92%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
-75.00%
Interest expense reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 47.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.42%
D&A growth less than half of HUH1V.HE's 3.13%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
5.79%
EBITDA growth while HUH1V.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.16%
Other expenses growth while HUH1V.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.65%
Pre-tax income growth while HUH1V.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-9.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
19.02%
Tax expense growth while HUH1V.HE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.88%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.23%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.23%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.24%
Share count reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.68%
Diluted share reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.