PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.49%
Revenue decline while HUH1V.HE shows 2.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
2.52%
Similar cost growth to HUH1V.HE's 3.17%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-7.01%
Gross profit decline while HUH1V.HE shows 0.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.76%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.76%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.75%
Total costs growth while HUH1V.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
100.00%
Interest expense growth 1.1-1.25x HUH1V.HE's 84.38%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
9.77%
D&A growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 1.33%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
7.00%
EBITDA growth below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 28.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.67%
EBITDA margin decline while HUH1V.HE shows 24.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.66%
Operating income decline while HUH1V.HE shows 42.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.23%
Operating margin decline while HUH1V.HE shows 38.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
81.29%
Other expenses growth while HUH1V.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.86%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 36.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.40%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 32.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-11.42%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
10.43%
Net income growth below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 52.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.98%
Net margin growth below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 48.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
EPS growth below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 53.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 53.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.24%
Share count change of 0.24% while HUH1V.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.39%
Diluted share change of 0.39% while HUH1V.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.