PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.34%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
1.18%
Cost increase while HUH1V.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-27.70%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.76%
Other expenses reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 183.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-10.76%
Operating expenses reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 153.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.87%
Total costs reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 3.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.67%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-29.24%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-42.25%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-39.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.00%
Other expenses reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 25.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-38.71%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.86%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-80.41%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-35.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.36%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.36%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.28%
Share count reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.43%
Diluted share reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.