PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.10%
Revenue decline while HUH1V.HE shows 0.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.46%
Cost reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 1.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-23.17%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.40%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-68.88%
Other expenses reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 468.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
1.95%
Operating expenses growth less than half of HUH1V.HE's 21.39%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-1.66%
Total costs reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 3.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.60%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x HUH1V.HE's 1.18%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
-62.69%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-51.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-46.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-185.71%
Other expenses reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 30.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-68.64%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-65.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-59.35%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-70.84%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-68.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.53%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.53%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.28%
Share count reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 0.16% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.28%
Diluted share reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 0.16% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.