5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.45%
Revenue growth below 50% of STERV.HE's 2.90%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.45%
Positive growth while STERV.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while STERV.HE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-327.01%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
12.25%
Total costs growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 4.86%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
168.97%
D&A growth while STERV.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-44.21%
EBITDA decline while STERV.HE shows 20.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.46%
EBITDA margin decline while STERV.HE shows 17.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-106.06%
Operating income decline while STERV.HE shows 116.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-106.03%
Operating margin decline while STERV.HE shows 109.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
14.29%
Other expenses growth less than half of STERV.HE's 395.50%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-148.89%
Pre-tax income decline while STERV.HE shows 72.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-148.67%
Pre-tax margin decline while STERV.HE shows 67.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-400.00%
Tax expense reduction while STERV.HE shows 141.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-157.89%
Net income decline while STERV.HE shows 61.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-157.63%
Net margin decline while STERV.HE shows 57.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-156.42%
EPS decline while STERV.HE shows 56.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-156.42%
Diluted EPS decline while STERV.HE shows 56.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.