PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.65%
Revenue decline while STERV.HE shows 3.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.65%
Gross profit decline while STERV.HE shows 0.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34500.00%
Other expenses change of 34500.00% while STERV.HE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
8.29%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 3.76%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
8.29%
Total costs growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 4.78%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
158.06%
D&A growth while STERV.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-37.66%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-169.57%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-172.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.00%
Other expenses reduction while STERV.HE shows 31.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-270.97%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-277.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
100.00%
Tax expense growth while STERV.HE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-310.71%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-318.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-312.50%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-312.50%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.84%
Share count reduction while STERV.HE shows 1.22% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.84%
Diluted share reduction while STERV.HE shows 1.22% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.