5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-14.94%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-4.97%
Cost reduction while STERV.HE shows 4.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-51.13%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28500.00%
Other expenses change of 28500.00% while STERV.HE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
95.89%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 4.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
18.44%
Total costs growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 4.34%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.22%
D&A growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 0.58%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-829.17%
EBITDA decline while STERV.HE shows 9.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-957.19%
EBITDA margin decline while STERV.HE shows 11.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1553.85%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1844.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.25%
Other expenses growth less than half of STERV.HE's 69.39%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-693.10%
Pre-tax income decline while STERV.HE shows 690.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-832.35%
Pre-tax margin decline while STERV.HE shows 702.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-625.00%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-533.33%
Net income decline while STERV.HE shows 296.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-644.53%
Net margin decline while STERV.HE shows 300.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-472.73%
EPS decline while STERV.HE shows 300.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-472.73%
Diluted EPS decline while STERV.HE shows 300.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
10.58%
Share count increase while STERV.HE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.58%
Diluted share increase while STERV.HE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.