PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.77%
Revenue decline while STERV.HE shows 2.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-15.88%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
4.85%
Gross profit growth below 50% of STERV.HE's 31.26%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.84%
Margin expansion 50-75% of STERV.HE's 28.42%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
162.34%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 30.65%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
7.64%
Similar operating expenses growth to STERV.HE's 7.12%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-11.51%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-80.00%
Interest expense reduction while STERV.HE shows 30.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
40.56%
D&A growth less than half of STERV.HE's 405.52%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
84.00%
EBITDA growth while STERV.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.73%
EBITDA margin growth while STERV.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-106.45%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-107.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
36.36%
Other expenses growth while STERV.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-67.44%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-63.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-66.67%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-48.94%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.48%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.48%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.