PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.45%
Similar revenue growth to UPM.HE's 0.47%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.45%
Gross profit growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 494.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 118.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-327.01%
Operating expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 1047.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.25%
Total costs growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
168.97%
D&A change of 168.97% while UPM.HE maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-44.21%
EBITDA decline while UPM.HE shows 17.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.46%
EBITDA margin decline while UPM.HE shows 16.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-106.06%
Operating income decline while UPM.HE shows 20.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-106.03%
Operating margin decline while UPM.HE shows 20.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
14.29%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-148.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-148.67%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-400.00%
Tax expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 38.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-157.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-157.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-156.42%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-156.42%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.