PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.560.02 (-0.36%)
5.56 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
45 / 2.4K (Avg.)
-278.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.65%
Revenue decline while UPM.HE shows 2.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.65%
Gross profit decline while UPM.HE shows 2.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34500.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 1.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
8.29%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 1.23%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
8.29%
Total costs growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 2.83%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 2600.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
158.06%
D&A growth while UPM.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-37.66%
EBITDA decline while UPM.HE shows 37.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-35.30%
EBITDA margin decline while UPM.HE shows 16.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-169.57%
Operating income decline while UPM.HE shows 3.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-172.20%
Operating margin decline while UPM.HE shows 0.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.00%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 775.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-270.97%
Pre-tax income decline while UPM.HE shows 62.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-277.44%
Pre-tax margin decline while UPM.HE shows 57.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
100.00%
Tax expense growth while UPM.HE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-310.71%
Net income decline while UPM.HE shows 74.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-318.70%
Net margin decline while UPM.HE shows 69.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-312.50%
EPS decline while UPM.HE shows 69.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-312.50%
Diluted EPS decline while UPM.HE shows 75.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.84%
Share count reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.84%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.