PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-14.94%
Revenue decline while UPM.HE shows 3.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.97%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-51.13%
Gross profit decline while UPM.HE shows 219.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-42.55%
Margin decline while UPM.HE shows 209.61% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28500.00%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
95.89%
Operating expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.44%
Total costs growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.22%
D&A growth while UPM.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-829.17%
EBITDA decline while UPM.HE shows 41.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-957.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1553.85%
Operating income decline while UPM.HE shows 143.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1844.22%
Operating margin decline while UPM.HE shows 141.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.25%
Other expenses growth less than half of UPM.HE's 189.29%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-693.10%
Pre-tax income decline while UPM.HE shows 150.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-832.35%
Pre-tax margin decline while UPM.HE shows 148.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-625.00%
Tax expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 89.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-533.33%
Net income decline while UPM.HE shows 193.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-644.53%
Net margin decline while UPM.HE shows 190.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-472.73%
EPS decline while UPM.HE shows 190.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-472.73%
Diluted EPS decline while UPM.HE shows 190.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
10.58%
Share count increase while UPM.HE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.58%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of UPM.HE's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.