PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.92%
Positive growth while UPM.HE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.09%
Cost increase while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
1.44%
Positive growth while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
672.73%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
672.73%
Operating expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
43.21%
Total costs growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
493.10%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 18.18%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
3.57%
D&A growth while UPM.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-71.64%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-78.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-86.34%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-86.59%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-446.15%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-94.97%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-95.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-110.53%
Tax expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 14.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-94.29%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-93.02%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-93.02%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.54%
Share count reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-23.54%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.