PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.32%
Revenue decline while UPM.HE shows 2.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-3.07%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-7.80%
Gross profit decline while UPM.HE shows 1001.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.64%
Margin decline while UPM.HE shows 971.66% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.40%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 1354.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-25.40%
Operating expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 1354.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.51%
Total costs reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.79%
Interest expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 261.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-51.72%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
4.48%
EBITDA growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
39.36%
EBITDA margin growth 1.25-1.5x UPM.HE's 30.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
86.36%
Operating income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
94.78%
Operating margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.41%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
237.50%
Pre-tax income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
252.75%
Pre-tax margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-550.00%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
400.00%
Net income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
422.59%
Net margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
333.33%
EPS growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
333.33%
Diluted EPS growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.08%
Share count reduction below 50% of UPM.HE's 0.13%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
23.08%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of UPM.HE's 0.20%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.