PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.11%
Positive growth while UPM.HE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.88%
Cost growth less than half of UPM.HE's 2086.96%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
8.69%
Positive growth while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.41%
Margin expansion while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.34%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
22.34%
Operating expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.55%
Total costs growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
62.67%
Interest expense growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
90.00%
D&A growth while UPM.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.43%
EBITDA growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 115.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.26%
EBITDA margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-15.12%
Operating income decline while UPM.HE shows 104.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.25%
Operating margin decline while UPM.HE shows 105.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-87.86%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 51.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-68.52%
Pre-tax income decline while UPM.HE shows 103.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.05%
Pre-tax margin decline while UPM.HE shows 104.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
103.85%
Similar tax expense growth to UPM.HE's 109.22%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
-80.00%
Net income decline while UPM.HE shows 103.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-80.97%
Net margin decline while UPM.HE shows 103.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-84.62%
EPS decline while UPM.HE shows 103.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-84.62%
Diluted EPS decline while UPM.HE shows 103.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
30.00%
Share count change of 30.00% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
30.00%
Diluted share change of 30.00% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.