PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.02%
Revenue decline while UPM.HE shows 1.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-6.73%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-4.03%
Gross profit decline while UPM.HE shows 52.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.11%
Margin expansion below 50% of UPM.HE's 50.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.09%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 33.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-0.09%
Operating expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 33.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.23%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-67.62%
Interest expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 15.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.53%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-11.07%
EBITDA decline while UPM.HE shows 23.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.38%
EBITDA margin decline while UPM.HE shows 21.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.95%
Operating income decline while UPM.HE shows 80.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.64%
Operating margin decline while UPM.HE shows 76.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
71.10%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
150.59%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 93.94%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
166.64%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 90.40%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
640.00%
Tax expense growth while UPM.HE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
120.00%
Similar net income growth to UPM.HE's 142.55%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
134.09%
Similar net margin growth to UPM.HE's 138.13%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
200.00%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x UPM.HE's 144.44%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
200.00%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x UPM.HE's 144.44%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-26.67%
Share count reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-26.67%
Diluted share reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.29% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.