PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.60%
Revenue decline while UPM.HE shows 4.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
14.08%
Cost increase while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-59.67%
Gross profit decline while UPM.HE shows 794.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-57.73%
Margin decline while UPM.HE shows 754.12% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.81%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 2230.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-59.81%
Operating expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 2230.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.46%
Total costs reduction while UPM.HE shows 7.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
72.03%
Interest expense growth less than half of UPM.HE's 268.18%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
6.07%
D&A growth while UPM.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
158.46%
EBITDA growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
56.19%
EBITDA margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
58.55%
Operating income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
66.19%
Operating margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-12.62%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 9.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
111.11%
Pre-tax income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
121.29%
Pre-tax margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-817.65%
Tax expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 182.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
331.94%
Net income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
352.77%
Net margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
332.00%
EPS growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
332.00%
Diluted EPS growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.