PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.59%
Positive growth while UPM.HE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-16.43%
Cost reduction while UPM.HE shows 6871.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
179.92%
Positive growth while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
167.63%
Margin expansion while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
136.25%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
136.25%
Operating expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.35%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-14.29%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.91%
D&A reduction while UPM.HE shows 4.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.71%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.56%
EBITDA margin decline while UPM.HE shows 13.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
42.16%
Similar operating income growth to UPM.HE's 42.54%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
35.92%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of UPM.HE's 48.68%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-50.86%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 342.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
36.84%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 106.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.84%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 114.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
109.84%
Tax expense growth while UPM.HE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-20.26%
Net income decline while UPM.HE shows 436.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.76%
Net margin decline while UPM.HE shows 459.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.30%
EPS decline while UPM.HE shows 429.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.30%
Diluted EPS decline while UPM.HE shows 429.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.35%
Share count change of 1.35% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
1.35%
Diluted share change of 1.35% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.