PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.44%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-1.29%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-1.81%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.38%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.39%
Other expenses change of 8.39% while UPM.HE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
8.39%
Operating expenses change of 8.39% while UPM.HE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
1.00%
Total costs growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-54.02%
Interest expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 60.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.78%
D&A reduction while UPM.HE shows 1.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-45.01%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.98%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
52.57%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.08%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
491.67%
Tax expense growth while UPM.HE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-32.26%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.53%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.53%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.16%
Share count reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.46% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-5.16%
Diluted share reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.46% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.