PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.01%
Positive growth while UPM.HE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.13%
Cost increase while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
1.21%
Gross profit growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 17.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.69%
Margin decline while UPM.HE shows 19.11% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.92%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.92%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.34%
Total costs growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.25%
Interest expense growth less than half of UPM.HE's 18.75%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
12.24%
D&A growth while UPM.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.26%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of UPM.HE's 17.92%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
5.14%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 19.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.90%
Operating income growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 34.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.82%
Operating margin growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 35.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.61%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.21%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 34.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.00%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 36.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-25.35%
Tax expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 6.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
23.81%
Net income growth 50-75% of UPM.HE's 41.09%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
19.04%
Net margin growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 42.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.96%
EPS growth 50-75% of UPM.HE's 36.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
19.96%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of UPM.HE's 36.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
3.17%
Share count change of 3.17% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
3.17%
Diluted share increase while UPM.HE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.