PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.80%
Revenue decline while UPM.HE shows 4.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
17.76%
Cost increase while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-56.27%
Gross profit decline while UPM.HE shows 327.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-55.01%
Margin decline while UPM.HE shows 307.84% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.09%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 1916.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-32.09%
Operating expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 1916.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.75%
Similar total costs growth to UPM.HE's 6.38%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-22.22%
Interest expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 442.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
86.47%
D&A growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 0.78%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
41.05%
EBITDA growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.01%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 23.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-80.35%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-79.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
36.25%
Similar other expenses growth to UPM.HE's 36.36%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-93.87%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-93.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-184.91%
Tax expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 53.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-70.67%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.81%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.81%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.89%
Share count reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.19% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.89%
Diluted share reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.