PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.27%
Positive growth while UPM.HE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-14.71%
Cost reduction while UPM.HE shows 108.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
145.19%
Positive growth while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
132.93%
Margin expansion while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
55.88%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
55.88%
Operating expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.79%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
14.29%
Interest expense growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-47.38%
D&A reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
10.83%
EBITDA growth 1.25-1.5x UPM.HE's 9.66%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
5.28%
EBITDA margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
543.28%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 185.92%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
511.10%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 191.09%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-113.73%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1912.50%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 217.54%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1811.82%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 223.29%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
164.44%
Tax expense growth while UPM.HE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
380.33%
Net income growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 1837.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
356.30%
Net margin growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 1872.57%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
411.36%
EPS growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 1833.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
411.36%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 1833.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.09%
Share count reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.11% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-6.09%
Diluted share reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.