5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.67%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-4.89%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-4.16%
Gross profit decline while UPM.HE shows 104.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.54%
Margin expansion below 50% of UPM.HE's 106.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.05%
Other expenses growth less than half of UPM.HE's 17.31%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
5.05%
Operating expenses growth less than half of UPM.HE's 17.31%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.72%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-21.69%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.06%
EBITDA decline while UPM.HE shows 94.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.05%
EBITDA margin decline while UPM.HE shows 95.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.75%
Operating income decline while UPM.HE shows 149.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.77%
Operating margin decline while UPM.HE shows 150.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
22.83%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of UPM.HE's 37.50%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-18.10%
Pre-tax income decline while UPM.HE shows 173.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.09%
Pre-tax margin decline while UPM.HE shows 175.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
527.27%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 309.09%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-51.01%
Net income decline while UPM.HE shows 155.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.60%
Net margin decline while UPM.HE shows 156.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-46.67%
EPS decline while UPM.HE shows 156.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-46.67%
Diluted EPS decline while UPM.HE shows 156.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.14%
Share count reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-8.14%
Diluted share reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.