PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.11%
Revenue decline while UPM.HE shows 1.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
15.64%
Cost increase while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-61.24%
Gross profit decline while UPM.HE shows 322.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-58.27%
Margin decline while UPM.HE shows 315.21% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.18%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 1813.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-42.18%
Operating expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 1813.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.01%
Total costs growth less than half of UPM.HE's 10.65%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-53.85%
Interest expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 373.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.58%
D&A reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-10.55%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-37.55%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-32.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
33.80%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of UPM.HE's 60.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-38.11%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-85.99%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.12%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.45%
Net margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.12%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.12%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.