PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.76%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-24.59%
Cost reduction while UPM.HE shows 2157.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
127.85%
Positive growth while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
141.76%
Margin expansion while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.52%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
75.52%
Operating expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.21%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
116.67%
Interest expense growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.40%
D&A reduction while UPM.HE shows 13.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-22.05%
EBITDA decline while UPM.HE shows 2.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.57%
EBITDA margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.11%
Operating income decline while UPM.HE shows 25.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.75%
Operating margin growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 32.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.38%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.78%
Pre-tax income decline while UPM.HE shows 22.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.03%
Pre-tax margin decline while UPM.HE shows 29.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
34.48%
Tax expense growth less than half of UPM.HE's 71.43%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-9.81%
Net income decline while UPM.HE shows 17.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.30%
Net margin decline while UPM.HE shows 23.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.50%
EPS decline while UPM.HE shows 19.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.50%
Diluted EPS decline while UPM.HE shows 19.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.92%
Share count change of 1.92% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
1.92%
Diluted share change of 1.92% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.