PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.41%
Revenue decline while UPM.HE shows 2.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.78%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-7.38%
Gross profit decline while UPM.HE shows 15.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.12%
Margin expansion below 50% of UPM.HE's 12.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.79%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-13.79%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.94%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-27.27%
Interest expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 21.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-17.27%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2.17%
EBITDA decline while UPM.HE shows 8.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.41%
EBITDA margin growth 1.25-1.5x UPM.HE's 11.81%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
18.84%
Similar operating income growth to UPM.HE's 19.48%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
29.75%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 16.73%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
27.59%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.48%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x UPM.HE's 18.99%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
35.90%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 16.25%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-65.57%
Tax expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 7.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
37.56%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 21.19%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
50.18%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 18.40%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
33.33%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 22.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 22.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.17%
Share count change of 3.17% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
3.17%
Diluted share change of 3.17% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.