PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.05%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-1.72%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-2.86%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.85%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.85%
Operating expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.41%
Total costs growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.09%
D&A reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-13.98%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.85%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.47%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.50%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-38.29%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-37.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-32.53%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-39.09%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-37.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.18%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.18%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.54%
Share count change of 3.54% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
3.54%
Diluted share change of 3.54% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.