PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.21%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-3.46%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
1.22%
Gross profit growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 224.94%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.51%
Margin expansion below 50% of UPM.HE's 231.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.25%
Other expenses growth less than half of UPM.HE's 920.59%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
20.25%
Operating expenses growth less than half of UPM.HE's 920.59%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
1.48%
Total costs growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
101.02%
D&A growth while UPM.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.09%
Similar EBITDA growth to UPM.HE's 4.49%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
6.44%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to UPM.HE's 6.46%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-52.94%
Operating income decline while UPM.HE shows 6.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.88%
Operating margin decline while UPM.HE shows 8.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
18.92%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-56.19%
Pre-tax income decline while UPM.HE shows 1.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-55.20%
Pre-tax margin decline while UPM.HE shows 3.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-87.30%
Tax expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 1.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-50.15%
Net income decline while UPM.HE shows 7.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-49.03%
Net margin decline while UPM.HE shows 9.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-45.30%
EPS decline while UPM.HE shows 8.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-45.30%
Diluted EPS decline while UPM.HE shows 8.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.86%
Share count reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-8.86%
Diluted share reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.