PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.32%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-5.12%
Cost reduction while UPM.HE shows 80.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
8.60%
Positive growth while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.05%
Margin expansion while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.61%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-6.61%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-5.49%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.03%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
8.72%
EBITDA growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.17%
EBITDA margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
69.00%
Operating income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
71.26%
Operating margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-63.33%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 72.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
70.00%
Pre-tax income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
72.27%
Pre-tax margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
737.50%
Tax expense growth while UPM.HE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
36.42%
Net income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.24%
Net margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.00%
EPS growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.68%
Share count change of 13.68% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
13.68%
Diluted share change of 13.68% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.