5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.21%
Positive growth while UPM.HE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-6.46%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
15.43%
Positive growth while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
15.18%
Margin expansion while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.53%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 46.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.53%
Operating expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 46.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.99%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.95%
D&A growth less than half of UPM.HE's 15.00%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
33.81%
EBITDA growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
45.60%
EBITDA margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
96.75%
Operating income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
96.33%
Operating margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
46.94%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
121.11%
Pre-tax income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
120.64%
Pre-tax margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
80.60%
Tax expense growth while UPM.HE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
133.94%
Net income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
133.44%
Net margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
150.00%
EPS growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
150.00%
Diluted EPS growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.43%
Share count reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-6.43%
Diluted share reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.