PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.40%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
2.08%
Cost increase while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-5.00%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.36%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 16.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.36%
Operating expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 16.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.74%
Total costs growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-14.94%
D&A reduction while UPM.HE shows 22.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.29%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.96%
EBITDA margin decline while UPM.HE shows 2.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.02%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.23%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 20.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.08%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.26%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-9.09%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.33%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.33%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.90%
Share count change of 4.90% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
4.90%
Diluted share change of 4.90% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.