PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.47%
Revenue growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 5.95%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
6.41%
Cost increase while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-13.70%
Gross profit decline while UPM.HE shows 320.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-14.10%
Margin decline while UPM.HE shows 296.54% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.55%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 3046.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-22.55%
Operating expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 3046.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.37%
Total costs growth less than half of UPM.HE's 22.05%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.82%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-3.34%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.65%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
93.33%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of UPM.HE's 166.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-5.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.82%
Tax expense growth less than half of UPM.HE's 31.15%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-12.90%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.64%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.64%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.86%
Diluted share change of 0.86% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.