PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.77%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 2.19%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
13.78%
Cost increase while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
7.65%
Gross profit growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 37.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.68%
Margin decline while UPM.HE shows 34.13% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.28%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.28%
Operating expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.72%
Total costs growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-75.00%
Interest expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 80.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.42%
D&A growth while UPM.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.79%
EBITDA growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 30.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-11.01%
EBITDA margin decline while UPM.HE shows 29.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.91%
Operating income decline while UPM.HE shows 83.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.34%
Operating margin decline while UPM.HE shows 79.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.16%
Other expenses growth less than half of UPM.HE's 750.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
0.65%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 101.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.95%
Pre-tax margin decline while UPM.HE shows 97.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
19.02%
Tax expense growth less than half of UPM.HE's 72.50%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-3.88%
Net income decline while UPM.HE shows 112.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.01%
Net margin decline while UPM.HE shows 108.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.23%
EPS decline while UPM.HE shows 112.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.23%
Diluted EPS decline while UPM.HE shows 112.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.24%
Share count reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.68%
Diluted share reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.