PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.49%
Revenue decline while UPM.HE shows 33.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
2.52%
Cost growth less than half of UPM.HE's 19.27%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-7.01%
Gross profit decline while UPM.HE shows 109.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.55%
Margin decline while UPM.HE shows 57.07% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.76%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.76%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.75%
Total costs growth less than half of UPM.HE's 18.44%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
100.00%
Similar interest expense growth to UPM.HE's 111.11%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
9.77%
D&A growth while UPM.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.00%
EBITDA growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 86.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.67%
EBITDA margin decline while UPM.HE shows 39.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.66%
Operating income decline while UPM.HE shows 133.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.23%
Operating margin decline while UPM.HE shows 74.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
81.29%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.86%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 112.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.40%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 58.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-11.42%
Tax expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 107.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.43%
Net income growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 115.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.98%
Net margin growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 61.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
EPS growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 116.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 116.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.24%
Share count change of 0.24% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.39%
Diluted share change of 0.39% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.