PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.77%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-15.88%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
4.85%
Gross profit growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 72.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.84%
Margin expansion below 50% of UPM.HE's 75.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
162.34%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.64%
Operating expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.51%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-80.00%
Interest expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 12.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
40.56%
D&A change of 40.56% while UPM.HE maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
84.00%
EBITDA growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 189.52%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
36.73%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 95.57%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-106.45%
Operating income decline while UPM.HE shows 1141.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-107.31%
Operating margin decline while UPM.HE shows 1163.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
36.36%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-67.44%
Pre-tax income decline while UPM.HE shows 446.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-63.10%
Pre-tax margin decline while UPM.HE shows 453.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-66.67%
Tax expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 179.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-48.94%
Net income decline while UPM.HE shows 715.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-42.12%
Net margin decline while UPM.HE shows 728.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.48%
EPS decline while UPM.HE shows 714.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.48%
Diluted EPS decline while UPM.HE shows 714.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.