PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.62%
Revenue decline while UPM.HE shows 4.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.33%
Cost reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-15.02%
Gross profit decline while UPM.HE shows 25.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.92%
Margin decline while UPM.HE shows 20.38% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.92%
Other expenses growth less than half of UPM.HE's 514.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
36.92%
Operating expenses growth less than half of UPM.HE's 514.00%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.10%
Total costs reduction while UPM.HE shows 23.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
16.05%
D&A growth less than half of UPM.HE's 399.25%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-49.82%
EBITDA decline while UPM.HE shows 28.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-43.86%
EBITDA margin decline while UPM.HE shows 22.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-104.08%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-104.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-77.27%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 23.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-114.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-115.86%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-143.84%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-125.44%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-128.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-125.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-125.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.75%
Share count change of 1.75% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
1.74%
Diluted share change of 1.74% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.