5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.22%
Revenue decline while VALMT.HE shows 4.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-7.26%
Cost reduction while VALMT.HE shows 5.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
5.30%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x VALMT.HE's 2.93%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
9.94%
Margin expansion while VALMT.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-116.18%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-116.18%
Operating expenses reduction while VALMT.HE shows 16.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-34.24%
Total costs reduction while VALMT.HE shows 8.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-81.88%
Interest expense reduction while VALMT.HE shows 6.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.45%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
575.00%
EBITDA growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
689.31%
EBITDA margin growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4125.00%
Operating income growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4302.35%
Operating margin growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
82.07%
Other expenses growth while VALMT.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
983.33%
Pre-tax income growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1022.25%
Pre-tax margin growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
733.33%
Tax expense growth while VALMT.HE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
1033.33%
Net income growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1074.46%
Net margin growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
972.21%
EPS growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
972.21%
Diluted EPS growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.56%
Share count reduction below 50% of VALMT.HE's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
7.56%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of VALMT.HE's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.