5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.32%
Revenue decline while VALMT.HE shows 45.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-3.07%
Cost reduction while VALMT.HE shows 53.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.80%
Gross profit decline while VALMT.HE shows 17.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.40%
Other expenses reduction while VALMT.HE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-25.40%
Operating expenses reduction while VALMT.HE shows 34.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.51%
Total costs reduction while VALMT.HE shows 132.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.79%
Interest expense reduction while VALMT.HE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-51.72%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
4.48%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of VALMT.HE's 8.47%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
39.36%
EBITDA margin growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
86.36%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x VALMT.HE's 30.56%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
94.78%
Operating margin growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.41%
Other expenses change of 1.41% while VALMT.HE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
237.50%
Pre-tax income growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
252.75%
Pre-tax margin growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-550.00%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
400.00%
Net income growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
422.59%
Net margin growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
333.33%
EPS growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
333.33%
Diluted EPS growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.08%
Share count increase while VALMT.HE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.08%
Diluted share increase while VALMT.HE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.