5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.11%
Positive growth while VALMT.HE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.88%
Cost increase while VALMT.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
8.69%
Positive growth while VALMT.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.41%
Margin expansion below 50% of VALMT.HE's 18.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.34%
Other expenses change of 22.34% while VALMT.HE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
22.34%
Operating expenses growth while VALMT.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.55%
Total costs growth while VALMT.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
62.67%
Interest expense change of 62.67% while VALMT.HE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
90.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 23.53%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
6.43%
EBITDA growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.26%
EBITDA margin growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-15.12%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-87.86%
Other expenses reduction while VALMT.HE shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-68.52%
Pre-tax income decline while VALMT.HE shows 111.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.05%
Pre-tax margin decline while VALMT.HE shows 209.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
103.85%
Similar tax expense growth to VALMT.HE's 133.33%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
-80.00%
Net income decline while VALMT.HE shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-80.97%
Net margin decline while VALMT.HE shows 193.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-84.62%
EPS decline while VALMT.HE shows 98.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-84.62%
Diluted EPS decline while VALMT.HE shows 98.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
30.00%
Share count reduction below 50% of VALMT.HE's 0.57%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
30.00%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of VALMT.HE's 0.57%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.