5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.02%
Revenue decline while VALMT.HE shows 13.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-6.73%
Cost reduction while VALMT.HE shows 18.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-4.03%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.11%
Margin expansion while VALMT.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.09%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.09%
Operating expenses reduction while VALMT.HE shows 3.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.23%
Total costs reduction while VALMT.HE shows 15.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-67.62%
Interest expense reduction while VALMT.HE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.53%
D&A reduction while VALMT.HE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-11.07%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.38%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.95%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
71.10%
Other expenses change of 71.10% while VALMT.HE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
150.59%
Pre-tax income growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
166.64%
Pre-tax margin growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
640.00%
Tax expense growth while VALMT.HE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
120.00%
Net income growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
134.09%
Net margin growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
200.00%
EPS growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
200.00%
Diluted EPS growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-26.67%
Share count reduction while VALMT.HE shows 33.45% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-26.67%
Diluted share reduction while VALMT.HE shows 33.45% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.