5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.80%
Revenue decline while VALMT.HE shows 31.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
17.76%
Cost growth 50-75% of VALMT.HE's 33.54%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-56.27%
Gross profit decline while VALMT.HE shows 23.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-55.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.09%
Other expenses reduction while VALMT.HE shows 1600.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-32.09%
Operating expenses reduction while VALMT.HE shows 25.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.75%
Total costs growth less than half of VALMT.HE's 32.33%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-22.22%
Interest expense reduction while VALMT.HE shows 300.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
86.47%
D&A change of 86.47% while VALMT.HE maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
41.05%
Similar EBITDA growth to VALMT.HE's 40.91%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
0.01%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of VALMT.HE's 7.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-80.35%
Operating income decline while VALMT.HE shows 42.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-79.79%
Operating margin decline while VALMT.HE shows 8.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
36.25%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of VALMT.HE's 50.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-93.87%
Pre-tax income decline while VALMT.HE shows 50.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-93.69%
Pre-tax margin decline while VALMT.HE shows 14.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-184.91%
Tax expense reduction while VALMT.HE shows 37.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-70.67%
Net income decline while VALMT.HE shows 56.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-69.83%
Net margin decline while VALMT.HE shows 18.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-69.81%
EPS decline while VALMT.HE shows 54.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-69.81%
Diluted EPS decline while VALMT.HE shows 54.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.89%
Share count reduction while VALMT.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.89%
Diluted share reduction while VALMT.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.